Search found 69 matches
Re: Tabel
Hello. I would have liked to seen the difference a year now I can see an overview. Is that not another way possible? I may have misunderstood, but if you want to see the same sort of thing but for a whole year you can achieve that by chaninging the timeframe . e.g. if you change timeframe=-1M # set...
Re: Tabel
I think that level of interaction is simply not a feature of the type of chart used for these 'weibull' charts?Gerrit wrote:This is what I want, I just do not get a date range, such as 1D 10D 1M 1Y MAX.
- Thu May 20, 2010 2:07 pm
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: New Chart-Type Weibull
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12403
Re: New Chart-Type Weibull
Staying with inc=0.1 and reducing time frame to timeframe=20090101000000-20090401000000 (i.e. 1st 3 months) gave 89 days, which is okay, but stretching to timeframe=20090101000000-20090301000000 only added half a day (i.e. 89.5 apparent days in 6 months). Is it maybe that some sort of 'ceiling' is ...
- Tue May 18, 2010 2:19 pm
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: New Chart-Type Weibull
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12403
Re: New Chart-Type Weibull
It is fixed now. Please give it a second try. Checking another th sensor that was so far as I recall was operating throughout 2009 I found what appears to be some inconsistency, i.e. weibull_csv_th3_2009-01 (timeframe=20090101000000-20090201000000) totals to 30.7 (i.e. ~31) days :) weibull_csv_th3_...
- Mon May 17, 2010 9:07 am
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: New Chart-Type Weibull
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12403
Re: New Chart-Type Weibull
It is fixed now. Please give it a second try. That's great. Thank you. :) Doing a cross check on the apparent hours in January 2010 wind3 I found the total was just under 29. I checked wind0 and got a similar figure, and again for th20. Checking th20 for February and March 2010, those totalled to j...
- Sun May 16, 2010 2:03 pm
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: New Chart-Type Weibull
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12403
Re: New Chart-Type Weibull
to get x-axis in km/h use: xstart=0.0 xinc=0.27777 # data gets collected from data base in the original unit (here m/s, so increments are 1/3.6) to make 1km/h steps xfactor=3.6 # factor used to stretch results when being displayed xoffset=0.0 # can be omitted as long as being 0.0 I just tried to ge...
- Sun May 16, 2010 11:02 am
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: New Chart-Type Weibull
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12403
Re: New Chart-Type Weibull
Excellent.
I see that the sfactor is 0.25 because the bucket size of 15 minutes is 0.25 of an hour.
Is there any way to apply a factor to the measured value to allow display in alternative units, e.g. 2.24 for mph, or 3.6 for km/h?
I see that the sfactor is 0.25 because the bucket size of 15 minutes is 0.25 of an hour.
Is there any way to apply a factor to the measured value to allow display in alternative units, e.g. 2.24 for mph, or 3.6 for km/h?
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:12 pm
- Forum: Handling Data
- Topic: No data
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7230
Re: No data
please update to 4.6g - that should fix that bug. Now using 4.6g (Build 3290). There was no raw data on the initial or second (i.e. 15 minute later) connection with Meteoplug, so I then used Settings to change back to 10 minute uploads, then Saved. Data is now flowing again. Thank you. :D There is ...
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:23 pm
- Forum: Handling Data
- Topic: No data
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7230
Re: No data
I have put the upload in 10 minutes, so far without success. In the interest of experimentation I just tried this too, including chaging the update time (10 mins => 15 mins) then using Save on the settings window (which schedules another recalculation - should that be necessary?), and so far I'm se...
- Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:35 pm
- Forum: Graphing
- Topic: Template Feature: A Meteohub => Meteoplug conversion example
- Replies: 18
- Views: 21124
Re: Template Feature: A Meteohub => Meteoplug conversion example
Looking good now:admin wrote:should be fixed by now.
Thank you.Wind Speed 8.9 mph SSW (202°)
Gust Speed 14.1 mph S (180°)